I honestly have never understood the point of blatantly misrepresenting something like this. If you disagree with their argument then that’s fine, criticise it, but why pretend they said something Kindergarten 20212022 Unicorn Rainbow Back To School shirt and attack that position that nobody holds?The claim is that sources with a major conflict of interest require far closer scrutiny, and if the only sources reaching a certain conclusion are the biased ones, then there’s likely something wrong with the conclusion. The only way you could disagree with the article is to claim that “conflicts of interest are irrelevant to evaluating scientific claims and data”, which would be insane.There are a lot of tacit white supremacy supporters on and reddit in general (before I trigger too many people here, obviously there are many who are not but this is reddit, home of bigotry and misogyny after all). Many of these people exhibit such an extreme degree of non self awareness they think they are being logical™ by READILY supporting the position that a largely race determined genetic IQ difference exists. Nevermind the 20+ years of evidence based critiques and dismantling of the garbage methodology/data within the bell curve – it’s all a PC conspiracy of course. These people won’t even ENTERTAIN the rebuttals, all they are interested in is confirming their own prejudice, it’s fucking ludicrous.This is the new white supremacy folks, this is the new racism. It is a fucking devious, trojan horse ploy that all of us, regardless of being white, black, asian or what have you need to keep a watch on and oppose at any given turn.
Kindergarten 20212022 Unicorn Rainbow Back To School shirt, Hoodie, V-neck, Sweater, Longsleeve, Tank Top, Bella Flowy and Unisex, T-shirt
Best Kindergarten 20212022 Unicorn Rainbow Back To School shirt
You most certainly do not need to disprove a theory to call into question the credibility of Kindergarten 20212022 Unicorn Rainbow Back To School shirt to support a theory. The OP never said “you should believe the opposite of the Bell Curve’s claim” he is simply saying “hold your horses on belief.” I don’t even know if the OP wants to disprove that theory, or if he only wants people to know this information so they don’t dive-in head first with gullible belief. Where is this forum’s skepticism now? You know it’s not skepticism just because a held belief is unpopular, right?No, that is not the case. Again, you do not need to disprove a theory to call into question the credibility of sources used to support that theory. that may result in you simply withholding a belief one way or the other.When a strong bias is shown by researchers, funders, and the journal, the correct action is to read the original sources critically for any errors – as it is this bias that often results in poor – or even downright dishonest – research. Take the guy who “proved” that vaccines caused autism. Now we know that he outright lied and manipulated his research, but the questioning began with people pointing out that “hey, wait a sec…this researcher is trying to promote and sell his own version of vaccines….hrrrm…I wonder if that could make him a bit biased?”Now we know he lied and manipulated – but we only know that because we began with questioning his possible bias. And bias does frequently lead to confirmation bias and piss-poor study methodology and analysis. Or even outright manipulation of the data.
You Can See More Product: https://molotee.com/product-category/trending/