this is absolutely worth Coke’s time. They get this stomped into the ground with ruthless abandon and Baltimore Ravens NFL Hawaii Floral Hawaii Shirt have new, firm precedent to shove in the face of any other wanna be authoritarian local governments. If they don’t stop it here, a bunch of other counties will probably follow suit and they’ll have to fight them all at once instead of having it already decided for them and they don’t have to have as much interruption of salesThis would make the MAGA attitude of “everything I don’t like is Marxism” extra delicious. They’re already calling the Coca-Cola corporation “Marxist” over their stance re Georgia voter laws, and if Coke were to sue government agencies that are using retaliatory tactics to hurt Coke’s profitability… that is literally. the. opposite. of. Marxism.That’s what I’m saying, too. Hell, I think they should do it just for the fun of it, but yeah, there’s a much larger issue at play here: the rise of authoritarian retributive rule. That’s a problem. Coke is a classic American brand like Ford or Winston or Walmart. It behooves them to protect the rights of the nation that allowed them to be the kind of company they are today.I mean even then the argument comes down to a fundamental violation of the constitution. Can’t see how arguing they’re preserving first amendment rights could play badly in the court of public opinion.
Best Baltimore Ravens NFL Hawaii Floral Hawaii Shirt
I just don’t see the precedential value here being very high. The retaliation doctrine is Baltimore Ravens NFL Hawaii Floral Hawaii Shirt pretty well fleshed out, so it would be more of an application of facts to law than anything else.Thinking more about this- do you think its likely Coke just sends a letter and the county decides to not actually do anything?Nobody would remember, not much money would be lost, politicians ‘win’ by (presumably) making their voters happy.I think the aclu’s real interest is in fund raising. This is the kind of thing that gets reported on and generates good will (focusing on the voting access, not the 50 bucks in lost revenue for a fortune 500). North Carolina has a reputation for being one of the worst states for voter suppression laws and gerrymandering, so I could see that angle playing well.But again, they’ve already got a ton of good will built up, and this case is pretty de minimus, so I doubt anyone will bother.
You Can See More Product: https://molotee.com/product-category/trending/